Top-level index / Complete interlinear beta

Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten

Aesthetica

Interlinear Beta v2 · §§351–375

Choose a view for each section. Quoted passages stay together in all four views; numbered notes identify their sources.

§ 351

Figurarum augentium agmen claudat exclamatio, non ea tantum, qua talia cogitantur, quae eloquenter legendo cum aliqua vocis intensione proferenda sunt, propter magnitudinem, sed et illa, quae cryptice designat, non sine admiratione talia menti nostrae obversari, quae iam cogitamus.

Let exclamation close the line of augmenting figures: not only that by which such things are thought as must, when read eloquently, be uttered with some intensity of voice because of their magnitude, but also that which cryptically designates that such things as we are now thinking present themselves to our mind not without admiration.

Quoniam enim parva ac proletaria non solent in admirationem sui rapere, denotatur eo ipso, quod pulcre cogitantem subit mirari, magnum aliquid esse, quod animo voluit.

For since small and common things are not accustomed to seize one into admiration of themselves, by the very fact that wonder comes upon the one thinking beautifully it is indicated that the thing which he has intended in mind is something great.

Quando legis apud Terentium:

When you read in Terence:

Sourced quotation · Terence [365]

D. Hei mihi! quid faciam? quid agam? / quid clamem, aut querar? / O! caeli! O! terra! o! maria Neptuni! / M. hem tibi!

"Demea. Alas! what shall I do? How behave? In what terms exclaim, or how make my complaint? O heavens! O earth! O seas of Neptune! Micio. Here's for you!"

Ad. V, 3. nonne comice saltim magna exspectas, quae resciverit clamans?

Adelphoe V.3, do you not at least comically expect great things that the crying speaker has learned?

Eiusdem scriptoris in Andria Pamphilus ita quasi genesin paullo post futurae exclamationis describit:

In the same author's Andria, Pamphilus describes, as it were, the genesis of an exclamation soon to come:

Sourced quotation · Terence [366]

Vix sum apud me. Ita animus commotus est metu, / Spe, gaudio, mirando hoc tanto, tam repentino bono,

"I am scarcely myself, so much has my mind been agitated by fear, hope, joy, and surprise at this so great, so unexpected blessing."

V. 4. Iamque non parva laetari videbitur post pauca concludens:

V.4. And now he will seem to rejoice at no small things when, a little later, he concludes:

Sourced quotation · Terence [367]

O! faustum et felicem hunc diem!

"O fortunate and happy day!"

§ 352

Quanta quanta sit in materiis aesthetica magnitudo, neque tamen illam assequatur, nisi subiectivae simul magnitudinis capax, quam magnanimitatem et gravitatem aestheticam diximus, § 189. Haec erit absoluta magnitudo ingenii et pectoris, § 45, sed non connata solum, verum etiam innutrita exercitiis, usu, § 51, ac disciplina, § 63, non ea mortua, sed plenis appetitionibus eliciendis sufficiens, quantam omnia magnitudinem, hinc et dignitatem, absolutam aestheticam habitura pulcre cogitanda requirunt, § 178.

However great aesthetic magnitude may be in the materials, it nevertheless does not attain it unless it is at the same time capable of subjective magnitude, which we have called magnanimity and aesthetic gravity, § 189. This will be an absolute magnitude of talent and heart, § 45, but not only one born with us; rather, also one nourished by exercises, practice, § 51, and discipline, § 63; not that dead kind, but one sufficient for eliciting full appetitions, as much magnitude, and hence dignity, as all things to be thought beautifully, if they are to have absolute aesthetic magnitude, require, § 178.

§ 353

Quando itaque nunc in omni pulcre cogitaturo magnum animum poscimus, non sedet animo Ciceronis illa notio, quae forsan in ipso severioris horizonte rationis ac purioris exaggerata nimium ac iusto augustior probari posset, ubi Quaest. Tusc. IV, 61:

When, therefore, we now require a great mind in everyone who is about to think beautifully, that notion of Cicero does not sit in our mind, which perhaps could be approved within the very horizon of a stricter and purer reason, though exaggerated too much and more august than is right, where in Tusculan Questions IV.61 he says:

Sourced quotation · Cicero [368]

Constantem, ait, volumus quendam, sedatum, gravem, humana omnia prementem illum esse, quem magnanimum atque fortem virum dicimus. Talis autem nec moerens, nec timens, nec cupiens, nec gestiens esse quisquam potest. Eorum enim haec sunt, qui eventus humanos superiores, quam suos animos esse ducunt.

"For we mean by the expressions magnanimous and brave, one who is resolute, sedate, grave, and superior to everything in this life: but one who either grieves, or fears, or covets, or is transported with passion, cannot come under that denomination; for these things are consistent only with those who look on the things of this world as things with which their minds are unequal to contend."

Catone maioris comitatis et humanitatis erimus heic contenti, modo possit ac velit absolute magna sectari, abstinere ab ineptiis, vilibus, ac humillimis, §§ 191, 195.

Here we shall be content with a Cato of greater affability and humanity, provided that he can and will pursue things absolutely great and abstain from silly, vile, and very low things, §§ 191, 195.

§ 354

Neque quaerimus in pulcre cogitaturo quovis virum probata sic pietate gravem ac meritis venerabilem, ut vel solo nutu silentium tumultuantibus imponere valeat, multo minus hominem qui fronte gravi tristique supercilio suas opiniones aliis contumaciter obtrudat, minime omnium unum ex iis, qui

Nor do we seek, in just anyone about to think beautifully, a man so venerable by tested "piety, grave and worthy by merits," that he can impose silence on tumultuous people by a nod alone; much less a human being who, "with grave brow and sad eyebrow," stubbornly thrusts his opinions upon others; least of all one of those who

Sourced quotation · Ovid [369]

ignava nequeunt gravitate moveri.

"But in her, as she endeavors to arise, the parts which we bend in sitting cannot be moved, through their numbing weight."

Nobis sufficit animus absolute magnorum, adeoque dignorum etiam, et potens et constanter avidus, seduloque cauturus, quae iam reprehendit Lucilius,

For us a mind of absolutely great things, and therefore also of dignified things, is enough: a mind both able and constantly eager, and one that will diligently guard against what Lucilius already reproved,

Sourced quotation · Horace, describing Lucilius [370]

Dum ridet versus Enni gravitate minores.

"Does not he ridicule many of Ennius' verses, which are too light for the gravity [of the subject]?"

§ 355

Hanc ingenii pectorisque magnitudinem et potentialem optamus, partem characteris generalis in felici aesthetico, S. II–VI, et tunc, quando ad pulcre cogitandum accedit, actualem, qua non alio solum tempore forsan et aliis occasionibus, sed et nunc, et ea ratione, qua iam res eget, possit, non velit solum antecedenter incompletis ex solicitationibus, sed etiam efficienter decernat, magna absolute, hinc et digna, quibus nihil insit pusilli, nihil humilis et abiecti, mente, praecordiisque concipere.

We desire this magnitude of talent and heart both as potential, a part of the general character in the happy aesthetician, Sects. II–VI, and then, when he approaches beautiful thinking, as actual: by it he can, not only at some other time perhaps and on other occasions, but also now, and in that manner which the present matter requires; he not only wills from antecedently incomplete solicitations, but also efficiently resolves, to conceive in mind and in the heart things absolutely great, and hence worthy, in which there is nothing petty, nothing low and abject.

Regnet in eiusdem persona, quam Cicero describit de Inv. II, 166, dignitas (subiectiva),

Let there reign in the same person's person the dignity, subjective dignity, which Cicero describes in De inventione II.166:

Sourced quotation · Cicero [371]

honesta nempe, et cultu, et honore, et verecundia digna auctoritas.

"dignity is the honourable authority of a person, combined with attention and honour and worthy respect paid to him."

§ 356

Si quibus pulcre cogitaturis actualis deest absoluta magnitudo animi, dignitasque personae, quam huc usque vidimus, sunt illi PULCELLI LEVICULIQUE MICROLOGI. (leptologi.)

If any persons about to think beautifully lack the actual absolute magnitude of mind and the dignity of person which we have seen up to this point, they are those pretty little, light little micrologists, or leptologi.

Sourced quotation · Lucretius [372]

Animasque leves ut noscere possis,

"Now come: that thou mayst able be to know
That minds and the light souls of all that live
Have mortal birth and death,"

magnum alias poetam Lucretium ibi lege, ubi L. III. rem unam ex maximis et gravissimis hoc elevat exordio:

read Lucretius, otherwise a great poet, in the place where in Book III he lowers one of the greatest and gravest matters with this opening:

Sourced quotation · Lucretius [373]

Nunc age, nativos animantibus et mortales / Esse animos, animasque leves, ut noscere possis: / Conquisita diu, dulcique reperta labore, / Digna tua pergam disponere carmina vita

"Now come: that thou mayst able be to know
That minds and the light souls of all that live
Have mortal birth and death, I will go on
Verses to build meet for thy rule of life,
Sought after long, discovered with sweet toil."

e.c. Huius vitii scopulus vix evitabitur, non solum infra horizontem aestheticum posita sibi themata legentibus, sed etiam supra eundem constituta, quoties haec nihilominus cum festiva quadam urbanitate non sine salibus ac iocis exponere laborant. §§ 120, 121.

etc. The rock of this fault will scarcely be avoided, not only by those choosing for themselves themes placed below the aesthetic horizon, but also by those choosing themes set above that horizon, whenever they nevertheless work to set these forth with a certain festive urbanity, not without witticisms and jokes, §§ 120, 121.

§ 357

Interim non nisi absolutam levitatem in omni pulcre cogitaturo culpari volo. §§ 355, 356. Potest aliquando pectus ingeniumque sane magnum, quantum Virgilii, Incolumi gravitate iocum tentare, potest idem ferri in comparative minus magna et digna, quae tamen absolute sint, §§ 198, 201. hinc ab ipso auctore dicantur levia secundum § 179 interpretando. Huc exordium mellificii, Georg. IV, 4:

Meanwhile I wish only absolute levity to be blamed in everyone who is about to think beautifully, §§ 355, 356. Sometimes a heart and talent truly great, as great as Virgil's, can "attempt a joke with gravity unharmed"; the same can be carried into things comparatively less great and worthy, which nevertheless are absolute, §§ 198, 201. Hence they may be called light by the author himself, when interpreted according to § 179. To this belongs the exordium of the honey-making, Georgics IV.4:

Sourced quotation · Virgil [374]

Admiranda tibi levium spectacula rerum, / Magnanimosque duces, totiusque ordine gentis / Mores, et studia, et populos, et proelia dicam.

"A marvellous display of puny powers,
High-hearted chiefs, a nation's history,
Its traits, its bent, its battles and its clans,
All, each, shall pass before you, while I sing."

§ 358

In medio relinquamus, nunc aesthetici, statum animi in Demosthene, quem damnat Cicero, in quaest. tusc. V, 103, iam non populari quadam trutina, sed aurificis statera examinaturus, quae probet, § 250. quando:

Let us leave in the middle, now as aestheticians, the state of mind in Demosthenes which Cicero condemns in Tusculan Questions V.103, since he is now going to examine it not by a certain popular balance, but by the scales of a goldsmith, which would test it, § 250, when he says:

Sourced quotation · Cicero [375]

Leviculus sane noster, inquit, Demosthenes, qui illo susurro delectari se dicebat, aquam ferentis mulierculae, ut mos in Graecia est, insusurrantisque alteri: Hic est ille Demosthenes. Quid hoc levius? At quantus orator. Sed apud alios loqui videlicet didicerat, non multum ipse secum.

"Our friend Demosthenes was certainly very weak in declaring himself pleased with the whisper of a woman who was carrying water, as is the custom in Greece, and who whispered to another, “That is he - that is Demosthenes.” What could be weaker than this? and yet what an orator he was! But although he had learned to speak to others, he had conversed but little with himself."

§ 359

Pulcelli habitualiter micrologi, leviculique minutiarum sectatores sint illi PYGMAEI HELICONIS, Parnassiique reptilia.

Let those pretty little habitual micrologists and light little pursuers of minutiae be those pygmies of Helicon and creeping things of Parnassus.

Parvulas in his animulas natura tales, numarios poetastros, et hoc genus omne, ridentes suo abundare ingenio iubeamus, hilaresque eo ablegemus ad suas imagines,

Let us laughingly bid the little souls in them, such by nature, the money-making poetlings, and all this kind to abound in their own talent, and cheerfully send them off to their own images,

Sourced quotation · Juvenal [376]

Ubi tota cohors pede non est altior uno.

"but in that land, where the whole host is only one foot high, though like battles are witnessed every day, no one laughs!"

Uni illi dolent, honestamque merentur misericordiam, quos iniuriae temporum, barbariesque locorum, in quibus vixerunt, saporque depravatus aequalium, vel honoratissimorum, eo compulit, ut animarum sic satis magnarum frivole prodigi vel in nugis ac ineptiis, vel omnino humillimis turpitudinibus, otium tererent, aut conspurcato pectore simul ingenium deturparent.

Those alone grieve and deserve honorable pity whom the injuries of the times, the barbarism of the places in which they lived, and the depraved taste of contemporaries, even of the most honored, drove to this point: that, being thus frivolously prodigal of souls sufficiently great, they wasted leisure either in trifles and ineptitudes, or in utterly lowest disgraces, or, with the heart befouled, at the same time disfigured their talent.

§ 360

Absolutam, quam huc usque consideravimus, animi, ingenii pectorisque magnitudinem, praesertim eam, quae nonnunquam etiam comparative maximis proportionate tamen pingendis, sine dedecore, pulcre sufficiat, probe contemplanti patebit moralis illa necessitas et pulcrae eruditionis, et morum laudabilium in felici aesthetico, quae nonnunquam doctores artis insigniter pulcrae eo abripuit, ut generatim loquendo regulam constituerent, quae iusto durior aliis est visa, iustoque latior.

To one contemplating well the absolute magnitude of mind, talent, and heart which we have considered up to this point, especially that magnitude which sometimes beautifully suffices, without disgrace, for painting even things comparatively greatest in a proportionate way, that moral necessity will be evident: both of beautiful erudition and of praiseworthy morals in the happy aesthetician, which has sometimes carried away the teachers of an especially beautiful art to such a point that, speaking generally, they established a rule which has seemed to others too harsh and too broad.

§ 361

Conceditur Horatii lex: A.P. 309.

Horace's law is granted, Ars poetica 309:

Sourced quotation · Horace [377]

Scribendi recte sapere est et principium et fons.

"To have good sense, is the first principle and fountain of writing well."

Quando autem contextum et sequentia conferentes sapere heic interpretamur philosophiae practicae practice peritum esse: tum, multis iusto plura postulasse videbimur.

But when, comparing the context and what follows, we interpret to be wise here as being practically skilled in practical philosophy, then we shall seem to many to have demanded more than is right.

Pari in culpa censetur esse Cicero, qui id ponit in primis,

Cicero is judged to be in the same fault, since he puts this first:

Sourced quotation · Cicero [378]

sine philosophia non posse effici, quem quaerimus, eloquentem,

"Let this then be laid down among the first principles, (and it will be better understood presently,)—that the eloquent man whom we are looking for cannot be rendered such without philosophy."

seque fatetur oratorem, si modo sit, non ex rhetorum officinis, sed ex academiae spatiis exstitisse, tandem oratorem describit virum bonum dicendi peritum.

and he admits that the orator, if indeed there is one, has arisen not from the workshops of rhetoricians, but from the spaces of the Academy; finally, he describes the orator as a good man skilled in speaking.

Nec Quintilianus notam effugiet, qui adhuc expressius:

Nor will Quintilian escape the mark, since he says still more expressly:

Sourced quotation · Quintilian [379]

Non potest esse orator, nisi vir bonus. Sit vir talis, qualis vere sapiens appellari possit, nec moribus modo perfectus, sed etiam scientia, et omni facultate dicendi.

"My aim, then, is the education of the perfect orator. The first essential for such an one is that he should be a good man, and consequently we demand of him not merely the possession of exceptional gifts of speech, but of all the excellences of character as well. ... Let our ideal orator then be such as to have a genuine title to the name of philosopher: it is not sufficient that he should be blameless in point of character (for I cannot agree with those who hold this opinion): he must also be a thorough master of the science and the art of speaking, to an extent that perhaps no orator has yet attained."

§ 362

Quid autem?

But what then?

Quemadmodum eruditio male simulatur coram eruditis: ita et boni mores coram moratioribus.

Just as learning is badly simulated before the learned, so too good morals are badly simulated before the more moral.

Quam primum ibi non nihil supinae ignorantiae, hic inconditorum morum sub vulpe latentium pellucet: peracta res est, et ex iudicum maxime competentium sententia turpitudinem turpius tegens condemnaris.

As soon as in the former case something of supine ignorance, or in the latter something of unformed morals hidden under the fox, shines through, the matter is finished, and by the judgment of the most competent judges you are condemned as covering shame more shamefully.

Quoniam itaque iam extra dubitationem positum est, nihil pudendae ignorantiae, nihil abiecti plebeiique debere phaenomenon fieri in pulcre cogitandis: primo quaeritur, an dissimulari satis apte possit animus utrinque laevus, deinde difficilius id saltim erit, quam aperto pectore talem et ingenio et moribus te sistere, qualis es, doctorum autem est regulas, quas possunt, facillimas praescribere; tandem, si detur aliquem, ingentem simulandi per habitum, posse virum bonum ita mentiri, ut ne minima quidem in eius cogitandi ratione transpareat mentis animique pravitas, quis vetat, eum virum bonum aesthetice verisimiliterque dicere, donec constet contrarium? §§ 15, 16, 211.

Since, therefore, it has now been placed beyond doubt that nothing of shameful ignorance, nothing abject and plebeian, ought to become a phenomenon in things thought beautifully, first it is asked whether a mind awkward on both sides can be concealed aptly enough; then at least this will be more difficult than, with open heart, presenting yourself in talent and morals as you are. But it belongs to teachers to prescribe the easiest rules they can; finally, if it is granted that someone, immense in the habit of simulating, can so lie as a good man that not even the least depravity of mind and soul shines through in his way of thinking, who forbids calling him a good man aesthetically and plausibly, until the contrary is established? §§ 15, 16, 211.

§ 363

Nunc itaque licebit, quam postulavimus § 45 connatam, exercitiis, § 50, et disciplina, § 63, corroboratam animi magnitudinem determinare paullo curatius absolutam, animum non honestum solum, sed etiam nobilem, § 213, qui consuetudine simul, altera natura, politius vivere noverit, cognitionemque tali virorum bonorum generi ordinariam familiarem etiam sibi facilemque consecutus sit.

Now, therefore, it will be permitted to determine a little more carefully the absolute magnitude of mind which we have required in § 45 as inborn and strengthened by exercises, § 50, and discipline, § 63: a mind not only honorable but also noble, § 213, which, by custom at the same time as by a second nature, has learned to live more refinedly, and has also acquired for itself the ordinary knowledge familiar and easy to such a class of good men.

Hic enim et mores simpliciter honestos et his proportionatam cogitandi rationem exprimere sufficiet, vires suas nonnihil reprimendo, et heroicam vivendi rationem eiusque maiestatem attingere, si volet, et omnes animi nervos in eximia quaedam dignis repraesentanda modis adstringet.

For this man will suffice to express both simply honorable morals and a way of thinking proportioned to them, by somewhat restraining his own powers; and, if he wishes, to reach a heroic way of living and its majesty, and he will tighten all the sinews of his mind to represent certain exceptional things in worthy modes.

§ 364

Vera magnitudo animi quoniam tumori non minus, ac humili repentique rationi cogitationum ac vitae inimica est, § 363, tenuia cogitaturum docebit non sua solum sorte contentum esse, si vel ipse simpliciter honestum vitae genus assequi tantum possit, sed et nobilitate morum ac ingenii conspicuum, et ipsos heroas, neque res de themate concipiendas, neque cogitandi modum ac rationem augustius informare, ac res, de qua potissimum agendum est, permiserit.

Since true magnitude of mind is no less hostile to swelling than to a humble and creeping manner of thoughts and life, § 363, it will teach one about to think slight things not merely to be content with his own lot if he himself can only attain a simply honorable kind of life, but also to be conspicuous by nobility of morals and talent, and not to form the heroes themselves, nor the things to be conceived from the theme, nor the mode and manner of thinking, more augustly than the matter chiefly to be treated permits.

In tenui si fuerit labor, omnis maior nobilitas et heroismus ipse velut exuendus est, ad hoc unum utiles, ut, quo maiores sunt in aliquo, hoc illi facilius sit, ita tenuitatis servare terminos, ne in abiecta et spinas pro myricis deprimatur, vel sinistris avibus intumescat cogitatio. §§ 245, 263.

If the labor is in the slight, every greater nobility and heroism itself must as it were be put off, useful for this one thing: that the greater they are in someone, the easier it may be for him so to preserve the limits of slightness that thought is not depressed into abject things and thorns instead of tamarisks, or swollen under unlucky birds, §§ 245, 263.

§ 365

Ad veram et naturalem tenuium magnitudinem exprimendam sufficit quidem ingenium et pectus in pulcris unum ex minimis, neque tamen necessarium est, quoniam, maiora quae possunt, et minoribus apta sunt, suis parcere docta viribus. § 369. Habes novam inter cogitandi genus in aestheticis tenue et meditandi rationes logicas, et concisas, eamque subiectivam differentiam.

For expressing the true and natural magnitude of slight things, a talent and heart that is one of the least among beautiful things is indeed sufficient; yet this is not necessary, since those powers that are capable of greater things are also suited to lesser things, once they have learned to spare their own strength, § 369. You have a new subjective difference between the slight kind of thinking in aesthetics and logical and concise methods of meditating.

Potest mens animusque insigniter philosophus, nisi pulcra male contemnat, tenue cogitandi genus exprimere, neque tamen huic satis magna laudi mens omnis ad philosophicam meditandi rationem assurgere.

A mind and soul markedly philosophical can express the slight kind of thinking, unless it wrongly despises beautiful things; and yet not every mind sufficiently great for this praise rises to the philosophical manner of meditating.

Potuit Leibnitius excogitare fabellas, non potest fabellis unice commodum ingenium ac animus calculum eius differentialem demonstrare.

Leibniz could invent little fables; a talent and soul suited only to little fables cannot demonstrate his differential calculus.

§ 366

Tenues venas animumque sua tenuitate, sed honeste, contentum ne confundamus cum leviculis Parnassi reptilibus, §§ 356, 359. In ipsis tenuibus quidem elegantiis in cogitando difficilis eiusmodi ingenio erit, quantacunque requiratur, eparsis, § 235: tantum tamen in pygmaeis Heliconis caput efferet, quantum humo myricae surgunt. §§ 180, 195. solliciteque gravitatis magnanimitatisque, quae datur in aestheticis, absolutae studiosum. S. XXIIII. eiusdem comparativae, minimum licet, aliquem tamen gradum tuebitur.

Let us not confuse slender veins, and a mind content with its own slightness, but honorably so, with the frivolous creepers of Parnassus, §§ 356, 359. In the very slight elegances in thinking, for a talent of this kind whatever eparsis, § 235, is required will indeed be difficult; nevertheless among the pygmies of Helicon it will raise its head only as much as tamarisks rise from the ground, §§ 180, 195; and it will carefully guard something devoted to the absolute gravity and magnanimity that is granted in aesthetics, Section XXIIII, and of the same comparative magnanimity, though a minimum, yet some degree, §§ 189, 185.

§ 367

Vel tenuibus satis magnus laudibilium aestheticorum animus, et ingenio regitur subtili, licet non sit subtilissimum, § 238. et facetiis illud ac honesta urbanitate condire, dictisque dicendis ac salibus et iocis lubenter assuescit suo tempore. § 237. sed ex vere venustis antiquorum exemplis, non ex illa ridicula recentium quorundam formula, quam et auctoritatibus et rationibus ostendit Vavassor, de ludicra dictione,

Or a mind sufficiently great for laudable aesthetic things, even in slight matters, is governed by a subtle talent, although it is not the very subtlest, § 238; and it readily becomes accustomed, in its own time, to season that material with witticisms and honorable urbanity, and with sayings to be said, salts, and jokes, § 237. But it does so from the truly graceful examples of the ancients, not from that ridiculous formula of certain recent writers which Vavassor, in On Playful Diction, shows by authorities and reasons

Sourced quotation · Catullus [380]

Ire praecipitem in lutum, § 195. per caputque pedesque.

"Hurlèd head over heels precipitous whelmed in the quagmire,"

§ 368

Animus solis tenuibus venuste cogitandis aptus et accommodatus facilius, maioribus autem nec impar difficilius, uterque tamen suam operam etiam in id bene locabunt, ne surgant altius, vel cognoscendo vel appetendo, ac sphaera cogitationum ac morum tenuibus definita protenditur. § 364.

A mind suited and accommodated only to thinking slight things gracefully will do this more easily, while one not unequal to greater things will do it with more difficulty; nevertheless both will place their effort well even in this: that they not rise higher, either in knowing or in desiring, and that the sphere of thoughts and morals defined by slight things is extended no farther, § 364.

Sourced quotation · Quintilian [381]

Admirabilis in suo genere Theocritus. Sed Musa illa rustica et pastoralis non forum modo; verum ipsam etiam urbem reformidat.

"Theocritus is admirable in his own way, but the rustic and pastoral muse shrinks not merely from the forum, but from town-life of every kind."

Quint. X.1. ita, ut pari cum incommodo forum, et urbem etiam, ea cogitandi ratione, qua Theocritus usus est, cogitare fingeres, et bucolica ex ea notitiarum votorumque sphaera describeres, qua gaudere solent in urbe, immo in ipso foro nutriti, ac versantes assidue.

Quintilian X.1. Thus with equal inconvenience you would imagine the forum, and even the city, thought in that manner of thinking which Theocritus used, and would describe bucolic things from that sphere of knowledge and desires in which those bred in the city, indeed in the very forum, and constantly moving there, are accustomed to rejoice.

§ 369

Recte Servius eundem Theocritum laudat ubique simplicem, personas addens

Servius rightly praises the same Theocritus as "everywhere simple," adding that the persons

Passage with quotations · Theocritus (concordance attribution); Servius is the actual author of the quoted critical comments [382]

in bucolicis esse rusticas et simplicitate gaudentes, § 213. scilicet a quibus nihil altum, nihil urbanum, nihil declamatorium. Virgilii figuras aliquas necessitate excusat.

"in bucolic poems are rustic and rejoice in simplicity," § 213; namely, persons from whom there is nothing lofty, nothing urbane, nothing declamatory. "He excuses some figures of Virgil by necessity."

Falli tamen, qui ornatus omnes, figuras omnes ideo vitare iubent tenuibus proportionate cogitaturum, § 237. vel ipsum Theocriti probet exemplum, in quo sane, si quis unquam, positivum etiam ἦθος βουκολικόν, § 194. tuetur.

Yet those are mistaken who for that reason order one who is going to think proportionately about slight things to avoid all ornaments and all figures, § 237. Let the very example of Theocritus prove it: in him surely, if in anyone ever, even a positive bucolic ethos, § 194, is preserved.

Id. I.76:

Id. I.76:

Sourced quotation · Theocritus [383]

ἁδὺ ἁ φωνὰ τᾶς πόρτιος, ἁδὺ τὸ πνεῦμα,
ἁδὺ δὲ χὠ μόσχος γαρύεται, ἁδὺ δὲ χἁ βοῦς,
ἁδὺ δέ, κ. τ. λ.

"Sweet is the voice of the heifer, sweet the breath of the pipe; and sweetly too the calf lows, and sweetly also the cow: and sweet is it in summer-time to sleep in the open air beside running water."

et tamen habet ornatum, figuram, anaphoram. §§ 343, 345. Quot idem plenus est comparationibus bene agrestibus, figuris tamen!

etc.; and yet it has ornament, figure, anaphora, §§ 343, 345. How full the same poet is of comparisons quite rustic, and yet figures!

§ 370

Hanc extenuationem virium et parsimoniam in eclogis, § 368. adeo strenue servasse dicunt Virgilium, ut duas tantum sententias habeat in omnibus, et simul sumtis, quarum una tamen non effugit criticorum severitatem, ac si iusto maior esset in ore pastoris.

They say that Virgil preserved this attenuation of powers and parsimony in the eclogues, § 368, so vigorously that he has only two maxims in all of them, taken together; yet one of these did not escape the severity of critics, as if it were greater than is right in the mouth of a shepherd.

Quos falli docet ipsa:

The line itself teaches that they are mistaken:

Sourced quotation · Virgil [384]

Trahit sua quemque voluptas.

"Each is led by his liking."

Cur enim non aliquem pastorum sua sententiarum voluptas traheret, quos Aristoteles generatim gnomotypous dicit, congruente Cervantis Sanchone Pansa mirabiliter?

For why would not his own pleasure in maxims draw some one of the shepherds, whom Aristotle generally calls gnomotypous, Cervantes' Sancho Panza agreeing wonderfully?

§ 371

Equidem non sententias solum, sed et bene multa alia phaenomena, quae figurarum habent apud rhetores nomina, in vulgaribus maxime hominum in honestis infimorum sermocinationibus observavi, mecumque plures, quae figuras non nominamus, quia non sunt pulcrae cogitationis partes, et circumstantibus neglectis turpiusculisque sic obscurantur, ut in iisdem peculiaris non detegatur elegantia, casui potius imputentur, instar flosculorum in pratis et ad trivia sponte nascentium. § 26. Quod tamen ideo monetur, ut hoc certius persuadeamur non peccare in verisimilitudinem ἦθος, si quis tenuibus etiam, quasi aliud agendo, non quaesitos, obvios tamen immiscet ornatus eiusmodi, qui possunt figurarum tritis nominibus insigniri, nec ideo talem suam tenuitatis sphaeram transcendere. § 368.

Indeed I, and many others with me, have observed not only maxims, but also very many other phenomena which among rhetoricians have the names of figures, especially in the ordinary conversations of human beings lowest among the honorable. We do not name them figures, because they are not parts of beautiful thinking, and because, with their surroundings neglected and rather ugly, they are so obscured that no special elegance is detected in them; they are rather imputed to chance, like little flowers springing up of themselves in meadows and at crossroads, § 26. Yet this is noted for this reason: that we may be more certain that one does not sin against the verisimilitude of ἦθος, if someone, even in slight matters, as if doing something else, intermingles ornaments of this sort, not sought out but nevertheless occurring to hand, which can be marked by the worn names of figures, and that he does not for that reason transcend such a sphere of his slightness, § 368.

Passage with quotations · Servius / Terence (quoted by Servius) [385] [386]

Et Terentius servis dat plerumque prudentissimas sententias quidem, sed quae se per naturam offerunt cunctis: ut: Ne quid nimis.

"And Terence for the most part gives slaves very prudent maxims indeed, but ones that offer themselves naturally to everyone: for example, that one do nothing to excess."

Servius ad Aen. X.

Servius on Aeneid X.

§ 372

Singulare documentum animi magni in tenuibus est quaedam eruditionis abnegatio, si data opera maioris ingenii, cognitionis, ac animi vir tenuia tamen expressurus, ne verisimilitudinem laedat, in eius persona, quem simulat, errorem committit.

A singular proof of a great mind in slight matters is a certain renunciation of erudition, if, by deliberate effort, a man of greater talent, knowledge, and mind, nevertheless intending to express slight things, commits an error in the person of the one whom he represents, lest he injure verisimilitude.

Huc post Theocritum, Virgilius in exemplum vocatur, quando scribit

After Theocritus, Virgil is called as an example here, when he writes:

Sourced quotation · Virgil [387]

I. Amphion Dircaeus in Actaeo Aracyntho,

"I sing as Amphion of Dirce used to sing, when calling home the herds on Attic Aracynthus."

Actaeumque Atticum interpretantur, non ac si Aracynthus fuerit in Attica, sed quasi simularit Virgilius pastoris ignorantiam geographicam:

They interpret Actaean as Attic, not as if Aracynthus were in Attica, but as if Virgil simulated a shepherd's geographical ignorance.

Sourced quotation · Virgil [388]

II. Pars Scythiam et rapidum Cretae veniemus Oaxen,

"some to reach Scythia and the chalk-rolling Oaxes"

nec constructiones de populis, terris, fluviis, ad quos veniamus, consuetas adhibet, nec Cretae flumen adscribit, quod habeat, quoniam Oaxen hi quaerunt in Scythia, illi in Mesopotamia.

Nor does he use the constructions customary for peoples, lands, and rivers to which we come, nor does he assign to Crete a river which it possesses, since some seek the Oaxes in Scythia, others in Mesopotamia.

Quos penes verum sit, nosse pastori licet cum ignarissimis.

Let it be permitted to a shepherd, with the most ignorant, not to know with whom the truth lies.

§ 373

Quam Longinus S. XXXXIIII. forsitan animi sui sententiam philosophi, nescio cuius, quem loquentem ab initio fingit, ex persona prodens principem caussam indicat, cur suis temporibus sit universalis adeo sublimium et magnificorum ingeniorum penuria, servitutem, dic dimidium virtutis auferentem: ea, si vel plenaria fuerit, praecordiis in libertate maiora ausuris tantum saltim relinquit magnitudinis relativae, quantum ad tenuia pulcre cogitanda satis est.

Longinus, Section XXXXIIII, perhaps disclosing the opinion of his own mind from the person of some philosopher, I know not whom, whom from the beginning he imagines as speaking, indicates the chief cause why in his times there is so universal a scarcity of sublime and magnificent talents: slavery, say, taking away half of virtue. If this slavery has even been complete, it leaves in hearts that would dare greater things in freedom at least only so much relative magnitude as is enough for thinking slight things beautifully.

Sourced quotation · Phaedrus [389]

Servitus obnoxia,
Quia, quae volebat, non audebat dicere,
Affectus proprios in fabellas transtulit,
Calumniamque fictis elusit iocis.

"A servitude was all along
Exposed to most oppressive wrong,
The suff'rer therefore did not dare
His heart's true dictates to declare;
But couch'd his meaning in the veil
Of many an allegoric tale,
And jesting with a moral aim,
Eluded all offence and blame."

Phaedr. l. III.
Quam apologorum genesin egregie confirmat, prima superstitum, Iothami fabula de arboribus regem quaerentibus, licet adhuc maius aliquid et sublimius applicando spirans, ac seriores mancipiorum ac libertorum fabellae aesopicae.

Phaedrus, book III. This origin of apologues is excellently confirmed by the first surviving fable, Jotham's fable about the trees seeking a king, although in application it still breathes something greater and more sublime, and by the later Aesopic little fables of slaves and freedmen.

§ 374

Magnitudo animi relative minima, vel potentialis etiam tantum, vel saltim actualis in elaborandis tenuibus nunc occupatorum est ingenium ac propensio simpliciter honestam vivendi rationem modumque cogitandi huic congruentem, et negative, et positive, sequi aptum et cupida, §§ 213, 214. obiecta non mediae solum, sed et maximae mensurae capacia simul, ex lateribus suis, absolute quidem magnis et dignis, horum tamen minoribus, contuenda sistere, § 215. βάθους, § 217. et primum, § 221. et secundum genus, § 245. tumoris, § 217. et primum, § 222. et secundum genus, § 263. effugere potest, tendit et fovet.

The relatively smallest magnitude of mind, or even only potential magnitude, or at least the actual magnitude of those now occupied in elaborating slight things, is a talent and inclination, apt and eager to follow, negatively and positively, a simply honorable way of living and a mode of thinking congruent with it, §§ 213, 214; to set forth objects capable not only of a middle measure but also of the greatest measure, at the same time from their own sides, which are indeed absolutely great and worthy, yet lesser among these, for contemplation, § 215; and it is able, strives, and fosters the effort to escape βάθος, § 217, both the first, § 221, and the second kind, § 245, and swelling, § 217, both the first, § 222, and the second kind, § 263.

§ 375

Eadem adeo genus cogitandi satis absolute magnum, praesertim absolute dignum, § 223, exhibere, vile de abiectis, § 224. vel etiam de tenuibus cogitandi genus, § 262. cavere, quaerere genus cogitandi absolute moratum, ut latius, § 226, ita strictius, § 228, male moratum utrumque vitare, § 228, gradus etiam et intercapedines in ipsis tenuibus belle metiri, § 233. data occasione inter bomolochian, scurrilitatem omni modo risui inhiantem, et agroikian, feritatem omnibus naturaliter asperi, medium tenere, quod eutrapelias aliquando nomine significatur,

Thus the same magnitude both loves and is able to exhibit a kind of thinking sufficiently great absolutely, especially absolutely worthy, § 223; to beware of the vile kind of thinking about abject things, § 224, or even about slight things, § 262; to seek a kind of thinking absolutely moralized, both more broadly, § 226, and more strictly, § 228; to avoid both kinds of badly moralized thinking, § 228; to measure beautifully the degrees and intervals even in slight things themselves, § 233; and, when occasion is given, to hold a middle way between bomolochia, scurrility gaping in every way after laughter, and agroikia, the roughness of everything naturally harsh, a middle that is sometimes signified by the name eutrapelia,

Retained quotation · Source not specified [390]

in ludo iocisque concinne se et decenter gerentium,

"of those conducting themselves fittingly and decently in play and jokes,"

et amat, et potest. § 237.

§ 237.

Sources and textual notes

[365] Terence, Adelphoe 790-791b. Henry Thomas Riley, The Comedies of Terence, Literally Translated into English Prose, with Notes (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853; New York reprint: Harper and Brothers, 1896), Project Gutenberg eBook 22188. Source 1

Baumgarten abbreviates the speakers as D. and M., prints caeli for the edition's coelum, and changes Micio's em tibi to hem tibi. His exclamation marks intensify the sequence but do not alter its sense. Riley's “How behave?” is an idiomatic rendering of quid agam?

Reuse information

Riley's translation was first published in 1853 and is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg permits reuse under its license terms.

[366] Terence, Andria 937b-938. Henry Thomas Riley, The Comedies of Terence, Literally Translated into English Prose, with Notes (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853; New York reprint: Harper and Brothers, 1896), Project Gutenberg eBook 22188. Source 1

Baumgarten expands contracted commotust to commotus est. He places hoc before tanto and a comma before tam repentino bono, whereas the comparison edition reads mirando tanto tam repentino hoc bono. Riley's prose keeps the emotional sequence and renders bonum as “blessing.”

Reuse information

Riley's translation was first published in 1853 and is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg permits reuse under its license terms.

[367] Terence, Andria 956d. Henry Thomas Riley, The Comedies of Terence, Literally Translated into English Prose, with Notes (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853; New York reprint: Harper and Brothers, 1896), Project Gutenberg eBook 22188. Source 1

Baumgarten's words agree with Terence; only the exclamation mark inserted after O differs. Riley retains both adjectives, faustum and felicem.

Reuse information

Riley's translation was first published in 1853 and is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg permits reuse under its license terms.

[368] Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 4.61. C. D. Yonge, Cicero's Tusculan Disputations (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1877), book 4. Source 1

Baumgarten's prementem (“pressing [all human things] beneath him”) is an attested variant rejected by the comparison edition in favour of spernentem (“despising”). He also replaces enim with the reporting insertion ait, prints atque for et, and uses moerens for maerens. Yonge follows spernentem and accordingly says “superior to everything in this life.”

Reuse information

Yonge's translation was published in 1877 and is in the public domain.

[369] Ovid, Metamorphoses 2.821. Henry Thomas Riley, The Metamorphoses of Ovid, vol. 1 (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1851; George Bell reprint, 1893), Project Gutenberg eBook 21765. Source 1

Baumgarten extracts the last four words of a line describing Aglauros's petrification. The omitted flectimur belongs to the preceding relative clause, “the parts which we bend in sitting.” Riley's “numbing weight” captures the bodily inertia of ignava gravitate, which Baumgarten applies metaphorically to false aesthetic gravity.

Reuse information

Riley's translation was first published in 1851 and is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg permits reuse under its license terms.

[370] Horace, Satires 1.10.54. Christopher Smart, The Works of Horace, edited by Theodore Alois Buckley (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1863), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Horace asks whether Lucilius “does not ridicule” verses of Ennius that fall below their subject's gravity. Baumgarten changes interrogative non to temporal dum, “while he ridicules,” so that the clause fits his own syntax after quae iam reprehendit Lucilius. The citation is therefore an adaptation, not an exact quotation.

Reuse information

Smart's translation originated in the eighteenth century, and the cited 1863 edition is in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[371] Cicero, De inventione 2.166. C. D. Yonge, “Treatise on Rhetorical Invention,” in The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, vol. 4 (London: George Bell and Sons, 1888), pp. 241-380; Peitho's Web transcription archived by the Internet Archive. Source 1

Cicero's complete definition begins dignitas est alicuius. Baumgarten supplies its subject in his framing words, dignitas (subiectiva), then quotes only the predicate, adding nempe (“namely”) and extra commas. Yonge's “attention” renders cultu as deferential regard, not as personal self-cultivation.

Reuse information

Yonge's translation and the 1888 edition are in the public domain. The Internet Archive preserves the web transcription.

[372] Lucretius, De rerum natura 3.418. William Ellery Leonard, De Rerum Natura (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1916), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten extracts the second half of line 418. He prints leves, while the source edition prints the archaic accusative plural levis. Leonard rearranges the syntax across lines 417-419, so the selected English includes the minimum context needed to express both animas leves and ut noscere possis.

Reuse information

Leonard's translation was published in 1916 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[373] Lucretius, De rerum natura 3.417-420. William Ellery Leonard, De Rerum Natura (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1916), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten modernizes the accusative plurals mortalis and levis to mortales and leves and adds punctuation, without changing the sense. Leonard renders digna tua ... vita as “meet for thy rule of life” and transposes the translation of line 419 after that of line 420.

Reuse information

Leonard's translation was published in 1916 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[374] Virgil, Georgics 4.3-5. James Rhoades, The Poems of Vergil (London: Oxford University Press, 1921), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten reproduces Virgil's words and introduces only editorial commas and capitalization. Rhoades expands the three Latin hexameters into four English verse lines and renders levium rerum as “puny powers,” emphasizing the contrast with magnanimos duces.

Reuse information

Rhoades's translation was published in 1921 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[375] Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 5.103. Charles Duke Yonge, The Tusculan Disputations of Cicero (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1877), as transcribed by Attalus. Source 1

Baumgarten inserts inquit after noster to fit the extract into his own sentence; that reporting verb is absent from Cicero's text. The remaining differences are punctuation and capitalization. Yonge's “weak” renders the diminutive leviculus and therefore preserves the lexical point for which Baumgarten quotes the passage.

Reuse information

Yonge's translation was published in 1877 and is in the public domain. Attalus states the translator and edition and supplies the online transcription.

[376] Juvenal, Satires 13.173. George Gilbert Ramsay, Juvenal and Persius (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1918), transcription hosted by Roger Pearse. Source 1

Baumgarten quotes the subordinate clause and omits Juvenal's preceding nemo. Ramsay translates cohors as “host” and restores the wider syntax of lines 172-174; the words corresponding to Baumgarten's extract are “where the whole host is only one foot high.”

Reuse information

Ramsay's translation was published in 1918 and is in the United States public domain. The hosting page identifies Ramsay as translator.

[377] Horace, Ars poetica 309. Christopher Smart, The Works of Horace, edited by Theodore Alois Buckley (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1862), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten preserves the complete verse. Smart's “good sense” renders sapere and his “principle and fountain” closely preserves Horace's paired metaphor.

Reuse information

Smart's eighteenth-century translation and the 1862 edition are in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[378] Cicero, Orator 14. Charles Duke Yonge, The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, volume 4 (London: George Bell and Sons, 1903), Project Gutenberg eBook 11080. Source 1

Baumgarten excerpts Cicero's infinitive clause and adds commas around quem quaerimus. Yonge recasts the Latin passive construction by making “the eloquent man” the subject, but preserves Cicero's claim that philosophy is indispensable to forming him.

Reuse information

Yonge's translation and the 1903 edition are in the United States public domain. Project Gutenberg identifies the translator and source edition and distributes the text for reuse under its license terms.

[379] Quintilian, Institutio oratoria, preface 9 and 18. Harold Edgeworth Butler, The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, volumes 1-4 (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, 1920-1922), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten's first sentence condenses preface 9, changing Quintilian's relative construction qui esse nisi vir bonus non potest into a direct maxim. His second sentence extracts preface 18, omitting both parenthetical qualifications and the final qualis fortasse nemo adhuc fuerit. The selected English joins Butler's corresponding portions with an ellipsis. Butler freely renders vere sapiens as a “genuine title to the name of philosopher,” making explicit the contrast with the philosophical schools in the preceding sections of Quintilian's preface.

Reuse information

Butler's translation was published in 1920-1922 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[380] Catullus, Carmina 17.9. Sir Richard Francis Burton, The Carmina of Gaius Valerius Catullus (London: printed for the translators, 1894), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

The printed “§195.” is Baumgarten's own cross-reference, inserted between the two halves of Catullus's verse; it is not part of the quotation. Burton preserves both the head-over-heels motion and the muddy destination, though in deliberately archaizing English.

Reuse information

Burton's translation was published in 1894 and is in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[381] Quintilian, Institutio oratoria 10.1.55. Harold Edgeworth Butler, The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, volumes 1-4 (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, 1920-1922), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten splits Quintilian's sentence after Theocritus and changes commas to a full stop and semicolon. Butler renders ipsam etiam urbem idiomatically as “town-life of every kind,” broadening the literal “even the city itself.”

Reuse information

Butler's translation was published in 1920-1922 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[382] Servius, In Vergilii Bucolicon librum commentarius, prologue 20-21, 35-38, and 85-88 in the Thilo-Hagen lineation. [Not yet assigned.]

Deferred: the final edition’s current translation is retained.

The concordance's attribution to Theocritus is misleading. Baumgarten condenses two comments by Servius about the rustic simplicity of bucolic speakers and Virgil's occasional figures. The Servian text is available in the PHI Classical Latin Texts edition (https://latin.packhum.org/loc/2349/6/0/1141-1145) and in Perseus (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0091), but no independent English translation of this prologue was located in the first pass. A second-pass search found English renderings of the relevant Servian remarks only in modern, copyright-era scholarship, not in a public-domain or out-of-copyright translation of the prologue. The automated Livy alignment was false.

Reuse information

[Not yet assessed.]

[383] Theocritus, Idylls 8.76-78. J. Banks, later J. Davies, The Idylls of Theocritus, Bion, and Moschus (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853). Source 1

Baumgarten's reference “Id. I. 76” points in fact to Idyll 8.76. His third line ends with καὶ τὰ λοιπά (“and the rest”), whereas Banks translates the complete line. The source and Baumgarten also differ in minor dialectal spelling and punctuation. Banks is selected because, unlike some older English editions that reject or omit the calf-and-cow line, it translates all the wording Baumgarten quotes.

Reuse information

The translation was published in 1853 and is in the public domain. The Internet Archive scan supplies the selected text.

[384] Virgil, Eclogue 2.65. H. Rushton Fairclough, Virgil, volume 1 (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1916), transcription hosted by Theoi. Source 1

Baumgarten extracts the self-contained close of Virgil's verse. Fairclough's “liking” renders voluptas and his “each” preserves the distributive force of quemque.

Reuse information

Fairclough's translation was published in 1916 and is in the United States public domain. The hosting page identifies the edition.

[385] Servius, In Vergilii Aeneidos libros commentarius 10.861. [Not yet assigned.]

Deferred: the final edition’s current translation is retained.

Baumgarten omits Servius's initial unde and repunctuates the sentence. Servius cites Terence's maxim, but the entire explanatory sentence is Servian; entry 386 separately records the Terentian source. The Latin locus is also quoted in a University of Barcelona study (https://diposit.ub.edu/bitstreams/af10881c-1959-4e11-a757-0b6e58d9dc79/download). A second-pass check of Conington and Nettleship's public-domain commentary at Aeneid 10.861 found no translation of this Servian comment. The first complete English translation of Servius's Aeneid commentary advertised in 2024 is a copyright-era commercial publication, not eligible evidence here. The public-domain translation of Terence's nested maxim in entry 386 cannot be substituted for a translation of Servius's explanatory frame.

Reuse information

[Not yet assessed.]

[386] Terence, Andria 61. Henry Thomas Riley and George Colman, The Comedies of Terence (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1872), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten and Servius quote only the proverbial subordinate clause. Riley and Colman's complete sentence reads: “Not without reason; for this I deem in life to be especially advantageous; that one do nothing to excess.” The speaker, Sosia, is a slave, which explains Servius's use of the line as an example of a prudent maxim assigned to a servant.

Reuse information

The translation was published in 1872 and is in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[387] Virgil, Eclogue 2.24. H. Rushton Fairclough, Virgil, volume 1 (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1916), transcription hosted by Theoi. Source 1

Baumgarten's Aracyntho differs from the source edition's Aracimtho, and his excerpt omits the preceding governing words. The complete English sentence is therefore supplied so that the fragment remains intelligible. The prefixed roman numeral belongs to Baumgarten's list, not to Virgil.

Reuse information

Fairclough's translation was published in 1916 and is in the United States public domain. The hosting page identifies the edition.

[388] Virgil, Eclogue 1.66. H. Rushton Fairclough, Virgil, volume 1 (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1916), transcription hosted by Theoi. Source 1

Fairclough reads lowercase cretae as the genitive of creta, “chalk,” whereas Baumgarten's capitalization supports the rival understanding “of Crete.” The English is the clause corresponding to Baumgarten's verse from Fairclough's larger sentence. The prefixed roman numeral is Baumgarten's.

Reuse information

Fairclough's translation was published in 1916 and is in the United States public domain. The hosting page identifies the edition.

[389] Phaedrus, Fabulae Aesopiae 3, prologue 34-37. Christopher Smart, The Fables of Phaedrus Translated into English Verse (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1913), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten omits Phaedrus's introductory Brevi docebo and adds commas. Smart expands four Latin verses into eight English lines and takes servitus obnoxia as a condition exposed to oppressive wrong.

Reuse information

Smart's eighteenth-century translation and the 1913 edition are in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[390] Not identified; probably Baumgarten's own explanatory gloss on eutrapelia rather than a quotation from another author. Not assigned; the wording is provisionally identified as Baumgarten's own explanatory gloss.

Deferred: the final edition’s current translation is retained.

In context, the phrase is a genitive definition attached to eutrapelias aliquando nomine significatur: it describes people “conducting themselves elegantly and becomingly in play and jokes.” Baumgarten supplies no author or citation, and exact-phrase searches located no earlier witness. The concept has a broad Aristotelian background in Nicomachean Ethics 4.8, but that does not establish an exact textual source. A second-pass check of the accessible Perseus Latin corpus and exact and variant phrase searches found only thematic parallels in Aristotle and in Aquinas's discussion of eutrapelia in Sententia libri Ethicorum 4.15-16, not Baumgarten's wording. Typographic emphasis appears to have caused the concordance extractor to classify the gloss as a quotation. The record therefore remains deferred rather than treating the contextual English explanation above as an existing published translation.

Reuse information

No translation rights basis is assigned because no existing English translation has been selected.