Top-level index / Complete interlinear beta

Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten

Aesthetica

Interlinear Beta v2 · §§526–550

Choose a view for each section. Quoted passages stay together in all four views; numbered notes identify their sources.

§ 526

Iudicium generale, s. dogma, vel est theoreticum, vel practicum.

A general judgment, or dogma, is either theoretical or practical.

Dogma practicum aesthetice cogitatum est sententia.

A practical dogma thought aesthetically is a sentence.

Conceptus inferior suum superiorem, sub quo continetur, declarans, s. clariorem reddens, est exemplum.

An inferior concept declaring, or making clearer, its superior under which it is contained is an example.

Exemplum sententiae stricte fictum, § 506, est fabula.

An example of a sentence, strictly invented, § 506, is a fable.

Quanquam enim quaevis, etiam strictissime vera, narratiuncula, quoniam eundo plerumque crescit et spurias ex adiectionibus fictis vires acquirit, nonnunquam fabula dicitur latius, ut ante suum diem ob luxuriam mortuus aliquis

For although any little narrative, even one most strictly true, because in going around it very often grows and acquires spurious powers from invented additions, is sometimes called a fable more broadly, as someone dead before his day because of luxury

Sourced quotation · Juvenal [557]

It nova, nec tristis, per cunctas fabula coenas,

"The news travels to all the dinner-tables, but calls forth no grief;"

Iuv. Sat. I. tamen strictius nobis utendum erit vocabulo simpliciter, ut strictissime veris opponatur narrationibus.

Juvenal, Satire I, nevertheless we shall have to use the word simply in the stricter sense, so that it may be opposed to narratives that are most strictly true.

§ 527

Fabula erit vel fictio historica strictius, §§ 526, 509, quae nullis interstincta fictionibus poeticis, § 511, simplex dicitur, vel fictio poetica, § 511, vel ex historicis poeticisque fictionibus mixta.

A fable will be either historical fiction more strictly, §§ 526, 509, which, interspersed with no poetic fictions, § 511, is called simple; or poetic fiction, § 511; or mixed from historical and poetic fictions.

Fictiones generis secundi et tertii fabulosae dicuntur.

Fictions of the second and third kind are called fabulous.

Nobis ad analogiam fictionum fabulas primi generis historicas, § 526, secundi autem et tertii generis fabulas dicere liceat poeticas.

Let it be permitted to us, by analogy with fictions, to call fables of the first kind historical, § 526, but fables of the second and third kind poetic.

§ 528

Fabulae historicae § 527 illae sunt, quae mediis aliquando fabellis interpositae tamen narrationum, immo historiarum, nomen accipiunt: poeticae autem sunt, de quibus Cicero de Inv. I. 27, tanquam de genere narrationum remoto a civilibus caussis, quod delectationis caussa non inutili cum exercitatione dicatur et scribatur (cogitetur venustius) loquutus easdem describit, eas (narrationes) quae nec (strictissime) veras, nec (strictissime) verisimiles res contineant, cuiusmodi sit:

Historical fables, § 527, are those which, although sometimes little fables have been interposed in their midst, nevertheless receive the name of narratives, indeed of histories: but poetic fables are those concerning which Cicero, On Invention I.27, speaking of them as a kind of narratives remote from civil cases, which is spoken and written for the sake of delight, not without exercise, (more charmingly, is thought), describes the same things, as those (narrations) which contain things neither (most strictly) true nor (most strictly) verisimilar, of which sort is:

Sourced quotation · Cicero [558]

Angues ingentes alites, iuncti iugo.

"Huge winged snakes, join'd by one common yoke."

§ 529

Quintilianus, l. 4, narrationum tres enumerat species 1) historiam (veram strictissime, saltem a potiori) 2) fabulam, quae versatur in tragoediis atque carminibus, non a veritate modo (strictissime dicta), sed etiam a forma veritatis (strictissimae) remota, 3) argumentum, quod (latissime) falsum, sed veri (strictissime talis) simile comoediae fingunt.

Quintilian, book 4, enumerates three species of narratives: 1) history (most strictly true, at least for the most part); 2) fable, which is found in tragedies and poems, removed not only from truth (strictly so called), but also from the form of truth (of the strictest kind); 3) plot, which comedies fashion as (most broadly) false, but similar to the true (of the strictly such kind).

Hinc etiam fabella est fabula nobis poetica, § 526. Quamque fabulam argumentum dicit, eam vere esse fabulam omnes concedunt comici, plerumque tamen argumentum Comoediae, et recte quidem, est species fabularum, quas historicas vocavimus, § 527. En! primum Terentii prologum:

Hence also a little fable is for us a poetic fable, § 526. And the fable which he calls a plot, all comic poets concede to be truly a fable; yet for the most part the plot of comedy, and rightly indeed, is a species of fables that we have called historical, § 527. See the first prologue of Terence:

Sourced quotation · Terence [559]

Poeta quum primum animum ad scribendum appulit, / Id sibi negotii credidit solum dari, / Populo ut placerent, quas fecisset, fabulas.

"THE POET, when first he applied his mind to writing, thought that the only duty which devolved on him was, that the Plays he should compose might please the public."

§ 530

Sicut itaque veritas vel strictissime dicta est singularis, (historica) vel heterocosmica, poetica, § 441, ita est etiam verisimilitudo aesthetica, § 483, dos pulcre cogitandorum universalis, § 22, vel ea, in qua ne latissime quidem dicta falsitas appercipitur, verisimilitudo strictissime dicta (historica) vel ea, in qua latissime quidem sic dicta deprehenditur falsitas, spectatoribus tamen amabili vigilantium somnio semel in alienum orbem delatis per elegantem cognitionem mediam, sic satis possibilibus alterius illius mundi semel suppositis, omnia bene et apte cohaerent, sine vividius notabili repugnantia, hiatu, saltu, e.c. Haec est verisimilitudo heterocosmica (poetica).

Just as, therefore, truth strictly so called is either singular, (historical), or heterocosmic, poetic, § 441, so also aesthetic verisimilitude, § 483, the universal endowment of things beautifully to be thought, § 22, is either that in which not even falsity most broadly so called is perceived, verisimilitude strictly so called (historical), or that in which falsity so called in the broadest sense is indeed detected, yet when the spectators, by the lovable dream of those awake, have once been carried into a foreign sphere through elegant mediate cognition, and when in this way the things sufficiently possible in that other world have once been supposed, all things cohere well and fitly, without a more vividly notable contradiction, gap, leap, etc. This is heterocosmic (poetic) verisimilitude.

Prior est fictionum et fabularum historicarum, poeticarum posterior, §§ 509, 527.

The former belongs to historical fictions and fables, the latter to poetic ones, §§ 509, 527.

§ 531

In iureiurando, quod habet Ovidius Met. III. 657:

In the oath which Ovid has, Metamorphoses III.657:

Sourced quotation · Ovid [560]

Per tibi (Pentheu) nunc ipsum, (Bacchum) nec enim praesentior illo / Est deus, adiuro, tam me tibi vera referre, / Quam veri maiora fide,

"By Bacchus do I swear to you (and naught
celestial is more potent) all the things
I tell you are as true as they surpass
the limit of belief."

in quo ratio complete certo videt nihil iurari, rationis analogon videbit verisimilitudinem historicam, potuisse aliquem bonum et pauperem piscatorem a primis unguiculis aquae potorem, qualis Acoetes iurans pingitur, orgiis et omni Bacchico apparatu in eum enthusiasmum rapi, ut talia bona fide iuret.

in which reason, completely certainly, sees that nothing is sworn, the analogue of reason will see historical verisimilitude: that some good and poor fisherman, a drinker of water from earliest nails, such as Acoetes is painted as swearing, could have been able, to be carried by rites and by the whole Bacchic apparatus into such enthusiasm that he would swear such things in good faith.

Poeticam autem verisimilitudinem tantum in sequentibus, si fictionibus heterocosmicis amabilia vigilantium somnia sequaris, secundum analogiam mythologiae graecoromanae, mutatos reliquos, Bacchi raptores in delphinas, solum Acoeten a Pentheo nunc in vincula coniectum, sed

But poetic verisimilitude only in the following things, if, with heterocosmic fictions, you follow the lovable dreams of those awake, according to the analogy of Greco-Roman mythology: the rest, the kidnappers of Bacchus, changed into dolphins, Acoetes alone now thrown into chains by Pentheus, but

Sourced quotation · Ovid [561]

Sponte sua patuisse fores, lapsasque lacertis / Sponte sua, (fama est,) nullo solvente, catenas.

"the legend says, though no one aided him,
the chains were loosened and slipped off his arms;
the doors flew open of their own accord."

§ 532

Hinc et concipi potest satis usitata fabularum divisio in probabiles et improbabiles.

Hence also the sufficiently usual division of fables into probable and improbable can be conceived.

Pone enim analogon rationis qualicunque fabulae verisimilitudine animadversa, § 530, velut excitari ad curatiores rationum in assensum vel dissensum ponderationes, in rationibus assensus solas eas numerare, quae probent veritatem strictissime dictam, reliquas veritatis cuiuscunque rationes negligendo, tunc paene solae fabulae historicae restabunt in bilance probabilium, reliquas omnes aut tantum non omnes sursum tollet improbabilium levitas.

For suppose the analogue of reason, once some verisimilitude of a fable has been noticed, § 530, to be as it were stirred up to more careful weighings of reasons toward assent or dissent, to number among the reasons for assent only those that prove truth strictly so called, while neglecting the remaining reasons of truth of whatever kind, then almost only historical fables will remain in the balance of probable things; the lightness of improbable things will lift all the others, or almost all the others, upward.

Hinc fabula strictius probabilis erit, ad quam statuendam possibile huius mundi plus videtur rationis esse, quam ad id, ut ea mittatur in exsilium ex hoc mundo in heterocosmica, vel omnino in mundum fabulosum.

Hence a fable more strictly probable will be one for establishing which as possible in this world there seems to be more reason than for its being sent into exile from this world into heterocosmic things, or altogether into a fabulous world.

Fabula autem strictius improbabilis erit, ad quam non habendam in possibilibus huius mundi plus rationis esse videtur, quam ad oppositum, §§ 485, 486.

But a fable more strictly improbable will be one for not having which among the possible things of this world there seems to be more reason than for the opposite, §§ 485, 486.

§ 533

Eodem itaque, quo veritates, fictiones, fabulas, verisimilitudines, probabilitates etiam aestheticas distinguemus in historicas, aut strictissimae veritatis superponderantes indices, et poeticas, superpondia veritatis heterocosmicae. §§ 441, 509, 511, 527, 530. Fabula improbabilis (historice et in hoc universo) non destituitur omnis probabilitate omni aesthetica (etiam, heterocosmica) § 531, latissime falsi similis, § 489, potest nihilominus multum veritatis aestheticae continere, §§ 441, 423.

Therefore in the same way in which we distinguish truths, fictions, fables, and verisimilitudes, we shall also distinguish aesthetic probabilities into historical ones, or indications outweighing toward the strictest truth, and poetic ones, outweighings of heterocosmic truth. §§ 441, 509, 511, 527, 530. An improbable fable (historically and in this universe) is not every one deprived of every aesthetic probability (even heterocosmic), § 531, though in the broadest sense like the false, § 489, can nevertheless contain much aesthetic truth, §§ 441, 423.

§ 534

Prima Phaedri fabula est improbabilis strictius, § 532. quanquam eadem nihil esse saepe verius probent ita mores saeculi, ut demonstrationibus Spinozae supersedere possimus, L. autem III. fabula X. qua praefata,

The first fable of Phaedrus is more strictly improbable, § 532, although the morals of the age so prove that often nothing is truer than the same thing, that we can dispense with Spinoza's demonstrations, But book III, fable X, prefaced by this:

Sourced quotation · Phaedrus [562]

Exploranda est veritas multum prius, / Quem stulta prave iudicet sententia,

"Therefore, we ought to examine strictly into the truth of a matter, rather than suffer an erroneous impression to pervert our judgment."

post materiem narrationis probe pensitatam non destituetur sua probabilitate historica, § 533, quanquam inusitatius est, talia contingere, quae narrat, quam quae prima finguntur fabula.

after the matter of the narration has been duly weighed, will not be deprived of its historical probability, § 533, although it is more unusual for such things to happen as it narrates than those things that are feigned in the first fable.

§ 535

Subiungamus fabularum aliquas species, etiamsi propius non spectent verisimilitudinem, ut compleantur ea, in quibus sedulo curanda pulcre cogitaturis est verisimilitudo. In fabulis insignis commutatio infelicitatis in felicitatem nodus est (peripeteia), quem quae continent, sunt eae fabulae implicitae et connexae, quarum partes desis et colligatio, metabasis et transitus, ac tandem lysis, solutio.

Let us append some species of fables, even if they do not more nearly regard verisimilitude, so that those things may be completed in which verisimilitude must be carefully cared for by those who are going to think beautifully. In fables a notable change of unhappiness into happiness is a knot (peripeteia); those which contain it are the involved and connected fables, whose parts are desis and binding, metabasis and transition, and finally lysis, solution.

§ 536

Quis nescit dramatum fabulas implicitarum eiusmodi fabularum exempla, nunc comica, nunc tragica?

Who does not know that the fables of dramas are examples of involved fables of this sort, now comic, now tragic?

Quemadmodum interim non ita felicem successum experti sunt tragoedias felicis eventus adorti fingere: sic nec illi rem suam agerent bene, quibus veniret in mentem comoediis vere tristem exitum affingere.

Meanwhile, just as those who have attempted to invent tragedies of a happy outcome have experienced a not very happy success, so neither would those conduct their affair well to whom it should come into mind to attach a truly sad ending to comedies.

Rationes ex cuiusvis poematis propria forma pulcrius erui possunt.

The reasons can be drawn more beautifully from the proper form of any poem.

Nunc sufficiat adnotare, non esse solas dramaticas fabulas ut eas cogitandas, quae nodum habeant.

For now let it suffice to note that dramatic fables alone are not to be thought as those which have a knot.

In ipsis epicis multae pluresque, quae sunt in iisdem, velut episodia, huc pertinent.

In epics themselves many, and more things that are in the same, as episodes, belong here.

Immo aesopicarum si placeret aliquas diducere, huc transfirent non paucae, quarum nunc nodus in scirpo quaereretur.

Indeed, if it pleased one to draw apart some Aesopic fables, not a few would be transferred here, in which now a knot would be sought in a rush.

§ 537

Exempla fabularum vel sunt ratione praedita, quorum fabulae rationales appellantur, vel quae censentur ratione destituta, et horum fabulae moratae quibusdam, aliis fictae, apologi, aeni, aisopopoiemata vocantur, vel partim ex prima, partim ex secunda classe coniuncta, quorum fabulae mixtae sunt.

Examples of fables are either endowed with reason, whose fables are called rational, or those which are judged destitute of reason, and of these latter the fables are called by some moralized, by others fictitious, apologues, ainoi, Aesopic productions, or they are joined partly from the first, partly from the second class, whose fables are mixed.

§ 538

Rationalium addamus tres species, vel ordines potius inferiores, exempli gratia. 1) Exempla divina vel divinorum, rationalia tamen, si quibus sunt, sunt eae fabulae theologicae, et strictius mythologicae. 2) Exempla amoris, quorum fabulae sunt Milesiae, et romanenses strictius, quae latius cum fictionibus poeticis coincidunt. 3) Exempla virtutis sublimis et gloriam promeritae, quorum fabulae sunt heroicae.

Let us add three species of rational fables, or rather lower orders, for the sake of example. 1) Divine examples, or examples of divine things, yet rational if there are any, are those theological fables, and more strictly mythological ones. 2) Examples of love, whose fables are Milesian, and romances more strictly, which more broadly coincide with poetic fictions. 3) Examples of sublime virtue and of earned glory, whose fables are heroic.

Quemadmodum his addi species ordinesve possent alii, sic maior quaedam fabula e.g. epica nonnunquam eos omnes amplectitur simul, quando

Just as other species or orders could be added to these, so some greater fable, for example an epic, sometimes embraces all of them at once, when

Sourced quotation · Petronius [563]

per ambages deorumque ministeria et fabulosum sententiarum tormentum praecipitat liberum spiritum, ut potius furentis animi vaticinatio, de castis heroum amoribus, appareat, quam religiosae orationis sub testibus fides.

"Events, past and passing, ought not to be merely recorded in verse, the historian will deal with them far better; by means of circumlocutions and the intervention of the immortals, the free spirit, wracked by the search for epigrams having a mythological illusion, should plunge headlong and appear as the prophecy of a mind inspired rather than the attested faith of scrupulous exactitude in speech."

Petr.

Petronius.

§ 539

Argumenta probantia nunc aestheticis nobis sunt, quorum vel unica, vel potior, vel certe iam potissimum consideranda vis est, § 143, exhibere cogitandis et quasi circumdare pulcram verisimilitudinem, et eam veritatem, quae quantacunque sit, quotcunque falsis videatur involuta, se probet tamen et iucundam ac facilem praebeat bonis omnibus haec veritatis viridaria penetrare gnaris.

Proving arguments now for us as aestheticians are those whose either sole, or stronger, or certainly now chiefly to be considered force is, § 143, to exhibit to things to be thought, and as it were to surround them with, beautiful verisimilitude, and that truth which, however great it may be, with however many false things it may seem enveloped, nevertheless proves itself and offers it as pleasant and easy to all good people skilled in penetrating these pleasure-gardens of truth.

§ 540

Velut omnibus aptum argumentis eiusmodi legimus exordium apud Lucretium L. II.

As suited to all arguments of this sort, we read an exordium in Lucretius, book II.

Sourced quotation · Lucretius [564]

Nunc animum nobis adhibe veram ad rationem. / Desine quapropter novitate exterritus ipsa / Exspuere ex animo rationem, sed magis acri / Iudicio perpende, et, si tibi vera videtur, / Dede manus, aut, si falsa est, accingere contra. / Quaerit enim rationem animus.

"Now to true reason give thy mind for us. [...]
Then, spew not reason from thy mind away,
Beside thyself because the matter's new,
But rather with keen judgment nicely weigh;
And if to thee it then appeareth true,
Render thy hands, or, if 'tis false at last,
Gird thee to combat. For my mind-of-man
Now seeks the nature of the vast Beyond [...]"

Nec tamen omnia, quanquam nec nihil, dicit post tantum prologum non ita parvus promissor, de mundorum multitudine.

And yet, after so great a prologue, the not so small promiser says not everything, although not nothing, concerning the multitude of worlds.

Quintilianus huc facientium argumentorum magnam congeriem conscribens, V. 10. vocem argumenti quidem probantibus persuadentibusque solis significandis nunc adhibet, ipse tamen monet omnem ad scribendum destinatam materiem dici posse argumentum.

Quintilian, writing out a great heap of arguments making for this, V.10, indeed now uses the word argument for signifying only proving and persuading things, yet he himself warns that "all matter destined for writing" can be called an argument.

Ergo et omnis ad cogitandum materies, ratio alterius perceptionis, perceptio, § 26.

Therefore also every matter for thinking, the reason of another perception, is a perception, § 26.

§ 541

Iam observavi Quintilianum non distinguere probantia argumenta a persuadentibus.

I have already observed that Quintilian does not distinguish proving arguments from persuading ones.

Hinc ad probationes euthymemata, epicheremata et apodixes omnes refert, evidenter probationes, uti apud Geometras.

Hence he refers to proofs all euthymemata, epicheiremata, and apodeixeis, evident proofs such as among geometers.

Sed infra patebit uberius, cur nunc ab iisdem abstineam.

But below it will appear more fully why I now abstain from these same things.

Aliud est argumentum veritatis aestheticae, aliud argumentum illustrans.

An argument of aesthetic truth is one thing; an illustrating argument is another.

Haec compone, et tunc demum habebis argumentum persuadens.

Combine these, and then at last you will have a persuading argument.

Omne persuadens probat, sed non omne probans persuadet, §§ 22, 539. Verum persuadeat etiam, nunc tamen unice attenditur, ut probans.

Every persuading thing proves, but not every proving thing persuades, §§ 22, 539. Yet although it may also persuade, now nevertheless it is attended to only as proving.

§ 542

Acquiescamus in descriptione apud Quintilianum l. c. quando,

Let us rest content with the description in Quintilian, cited place, when he says:

Passage with quotations · Quintilian [565]

argumentum, ait, (probans) est ratio probationem praestans, qua colligitur aliquid per aliud, et quae, quod est dubium, per id, quod dubium non est, confirmat.

"an argument is a process of reasoning which provides proof and enables one thing to be inferred from another and confirms facts which are uncertain by reference to facts which are certain,"

Verum ohe! quae quanta postulat?

This is a proving argument. But ah! what things, and how great, does it require?

Pergens:

Continuing:

Sourced quotation · Quintilian [566]

Debet nota esse, recte argumenta tractaturo, vis et natura omnium rerum, et quid quaeque earum plerumque efficiat. Hinc enim sunt, quae exorta dicuntur.

"Further, the man who is to handle arguments correctly must know the nature and meaning of everything and their usual effects. For it is thus that we arrive at probable arguments or εἰκότα as the Greeks call them."

Verum interpretemur nota aesthetice et res omnes, de quibus pulcre cogitare instituas.

But let us interpret "known" aesthetically, and "all things" as those about which you undertake to think beautifully.

Generatim enim suo postulato satisfacere concedit ipse longum, impossibile, aut potius infinitum esse.

For he himself grants that to satisfy his postulate generally is long, impossible, or rather infinite.

§ 543

Sed veniamus ad quaedam eiusmodi species argumentorum, non excussis denuo topicis, de quibus iam supra sic satis, S. X. Habent in figuris dictionis Paregmenon, qua radicibus et origine cognata coniunguntur vocabula. e.g. Ov. de Ponto, II. 5.

But let us come to certain species of arguments of this sort, without shaking out again the topics, about which above already thus enough, Section X. Among figures of diction they have paregmenon, by which words related in roots and origin are joined; for example Ovid, Ex Ponto II.5.

Sourced quotation · Ovid [567]

Tu quoque Pieridum studio, studiose, teneris, / Ingenioque faves, ingeniose, meo.

"You too are possessed with devotion to the Pierians, studious one; you, talented yourself, look with favour on my talent."

Haec quoties fit argumentum probans, vel ex finitione per etymologiam, quam Quintilianus dicit, aut ex onomatologia desumtum, vel illud de coniugatis, quod ridiculum putasset, nisi eo Cicero uteretur, fit figura sententiae, multa nonnunquam cum verisimilitudine adhibenda, §§ 26, 539.

Whenever this becomes a proving argument, either taken from definition through etymology, as Quintilian says, or from onomatology, or that one from conjugates, which he would have thought ridiculous unless Cicero used it, it becomes a figure of thought, sometimes to be applied with much verisimilitude, §§ 26, 539.

§ 544

Nec enim desunt in plerisque spectatorum, quos suos vult venuste cogitaturus, anticipationes huiusmodi: 1) Cordati nostri maiores vocabulis similibus et cognatis et cognatas similesque, profecto, res significare voluerunt. 2) Propositiones tautologicae, vel totaliter, vel maximam partem, sunt etiam identicae.

For in most of the spectators whom one about to think gracefully wishes to be his own, anticipations of this sort are not lacking: 1) Our sensible ancestors, by similar and cognate words, surely wished to signify cognate and similar things. 2) Tautological propositions, either wholly or for the greatest part, are also identical.

Fundamenta argumenti et etymologici, et a coniugatis eleganter petendi, § 543. Sic Cicero ex vocabulo convivii praelato graecorum συμποσίοις nunc vel ipsis germanis nostris verisimile redderet, si vellet, vivendum potius una esse in conviviis, quam una bibendum.

These are the foundations of an argument both etymological and elegantly to be sought from conjugates, § 543. Thus Cicero, from the word convivium set before the Greeks' συμποσίοις, would now make it verisimilar even to our Germans themselves, if he wished, that in banquets one must live together rather than drink together.

Neque apud germanos suae linguae fautores nullum erit argumentum, ex eorum essentiali vocabulo, quo felicitatem designant, ipsis aesthetice probaturi, virtutem eo beatitudinemque non minus, ac fortunam, pertinere, si quis id artificis manu tornare didicerit, ne scholam sapiat.

Nor among Germans, supporters of their language, will there be no argument from their essential word by which they designate happiness, for proving aesthetically to them that virtue and blessedness belong to it no less than fortune, if someone has learned to turn this with an artist's hand, lest it taste of the school.

§ 545

In figuris sententiae quae numerantur, earum aetiologian huc eo suo iure primam cito, ut eandem omne venustius probans argumentum audeam definire, et colorem, aetiologian stricte fictam, qui tamen non confundendus est cum coloribus, de quibus infra, sicut cura quaedam laudatur, curae vituperantur omnes satis commode.

Among the figures of thought which are enumerated, I cite their aetiology here first by its own right, so that I would dare to define the same as every argument proving more gracefully, and color, a strictly invented aetiology, which nevertheless is not to be confused with the colors about which below, just as a certain care is praised, while cares are all blamed quite suitably.

Est eiusmodi multiplicata aetiologia apud Ciceronem pro Plancio:

There is a multiplied aetiology of this sort in Cicero's For Plancius:

Sourced quotation · Cicero [568]

Quis est, qui neget, ordinis eius, (publicanorum) studium fuisse in honore Plancii singulare? Neque iniuria, vel quod erat pater is, qui est princeps iam diu publicanorum, vel quod is ab sociis unice diligebatur, vel quod diligentissime rogabat, vel quia pro filio supplicabat, vel quia huius in illum ordinem summa officia quaesturae tribunatusque constabant, vel quod illi in hoc ornando ordinem se ornare, et consulere liberis suis arbitrabantur.

"Who is there, then, who can deny that that body showed extraordinary zeal in aiding Plancius in his contest for honour? And it was very natural that they should, because his father is a man who has for a long time been the head of the company of farmers; and because he was exceedingly beloved by his fellows of that company; and because he canvassed them with the greatest diligence; and because he was entreating them in favour of his son; and because it was notorious that Plancius himself had both in his quaestorship and tribuneship done many kindnesses to that body; and because in promoting him they thought that they were promoting themselves, and consulting the welfare and dignity of their children."

§ 546

Coloris exemplum habet Iuvenalis Sat.

Juvenal, Satire VI.229, has an example of color.

VI. 229. quod fallor? an est alicubi gentium strictissime verum?

Am I mistaken? Or is there anywhere among nations something most strictly true?

Sourced quotation · Juvenal [569]

Sed (uxor) iacet in servi complexibus, aut equitis. Dic, Dic aliquem, sodes, heic, Quintiliane, colorem, § 545. Haeremus. Dic ipsa: Olim convenerat, inquit, Ut faceres tu, quod velles, nec non ego possem Indulgere mihi. Clames licet, et mare caelo Confundas, homo sum. Nihil est audacius illis Deprensis. Iram atque animos a crimine sumunt.

"But suppose her actually caught in the arms of a slave or knight. “Pray suggest in this case some colorable excuse, Quintilian!” “We are at fault! Let the lady herself speak!” “It was formerly agreed,” she says, “that you should do what you pleased, and that I also might have full power to gratify myself. In spite of your outcry and confounding heaven and sea, I am mortal.” Nothing is more audacious than these women when detected. They affect resentment, and borrow courage from their very guilt itself."

Ipsa illa decantata Virgilii sententia, § 499, non nisi color est, quo Aen. L. XI. Drances

§ 545. That very well-worn sentence of Virgil, § 499, is nothing but a color by which, in Aeneid book XI, Drances,

Sourced quotation · Virgil [570]

infensus, quem gloria Turni Obliqua invidia stimulisque agitabat amaris, seditione potentem animum tegit,

"Then Drances rose,
that foe inveterate, whom Turnus' fame
to stinging hate and envy double-tongued
ever pricked on. [...] in quarrels stronger still;"

v. 362. graviter reprehensus a Turno: v. 399.

verse 362. He is severely rebuked by Turnus, verse 399:

Sourced quotation · Virgil [571]

Nulla salus bello? Capiti cane talia demens Dardanio, rebusque tuis.

"War will not save us? Fling that prophecy
on the doomed Dardan's head, or on thy own,
thou madman!"

§ 547

Iam dictum de omni et nullo docet, quanto huc iure pertineat sententia, § 525, quoniam ex generalibus colligi singularium et inferiorum sub illis contentorum veritas solet.

What has already been said about every and none teaches by how much right a maxim belongs here, § 525, since from generals the truth of singulars and of inferiors contained under them is usually gathered.

Erit autem sententia probans etiam vel aetiologia, nunc complete certa, nunc aesthetice probabilis, vel color, § 545. Primae exemplum esto Salustii introitus:

But a proving maxim will also be either an aetiology, now completely certain, now aesthetically probable, or a color, § 545. Let the beginning of Sallust be an example of the first:

Sourced quotation · Sallust [572]

Omnes homines, qui sese student praestare caeteris animalibus summa ope niti decet, ne vitam silentio transeant, veluti pecora, quae natura prona atque ventri obedientia finxit.

"It becomes all men, who desire to excel other animals, to strive, to the utmost of their power, not to pass through life in obscurity, like the beasts of the field, which nature has formed groveling and subservient to appetite."

Secundae:

Of the second:

Sourced quotation · Sallust [573]

Mihi rectius videtur ingenii, quam virium opibus, gloriam quaerere, et, quoniam vita ipsa, qua fruimur, brevis est, memoriam nostri quam maxime longam efficere.

"It appears to me, therefore, more reasonable to pursue glory by means of the intellect than of bodily strength, and, since the life which we enjoy is short, to make the remembrance of us as lasting as possible."

§ 548

Sententiam, quae color est, § 546, optime morati tunc non raro suis interserunt, quando improbe factorum verisimilitudinem praestituri coguntur aliquid eorum promere principiorum practicorum, ex quorum perversa opinione mali animi pessime egerint.

A maxim which is a color, § 546, those best morally formed then not rarely insert among their own, when, about to furnish verisimilitude for wicked deeds, they are compelled to bring forth something of those practical principles from whose perverse opinion evil minds have acted very badly.

Huc sententia Euripidis, sed ex alterius sensu prolata, quam Cicero vertit, Caesar suam toties fecit:

Here belongs the sentence of Euripides, but uttered from the sense of another person, which Cicero translated and which Caesar so often made his own:

Sourced quotation · Euripides, in Cicero's Latin rendering and reported as a favorite quotation of Julius Caesar [574]

Si violandum est ius, regnandi gratia Violandum est, aliis rebus pietatem colas.

"If wrong may e'er be right, for a throne's sake
Were wrong most right:–be God in all else feared!"

Multa tamen opus in his erit cautione, partim ut satis constet ex mente scelerati talia proferri, partim ne tantum habeant ambiguitatis, aut adeo lepidae et venustae concipiantur, ut, plus aequo ne placeant, merito timendum sit, §§ 465, 467.

Yet in these matters there will be need of much caution, partly so that it be sufficiently clear that such things are being brought forth from the mind of a criminal, partly lest they have so much ambiguity, or be conceived so wittily and gracefully, that it is rightly to be feared they may please more than is fair, §§ 465, 467.

§ 549

Nec inutiliter sententiae distinguuntur in prolatas de facto et eas, quae de iure, iusto et aequo, concipiuntur.

Nor are maxims uselessly distinguished into those put forward de facto and those which are conceived de iure, concerning the just and equitable.

Priores rem quandam moralem generatim sistunt, ob oculos, uti plerumque se solet habere, uti solet contingere, non eo detorquendae, quasi probaretur et commendaretur imitandum, quod meditationis argumentum est.

The former generally set a certain moral matter before the eyes, as it usually tends to be, as it tends to happen, not to be twisted to this point, as if what is the subject of meditation were being proved and commended as something to be imitated.

Sourced quotation · Virgil [575]

Auri sacra fames, quo non mortalia cogis Pectora!

"O, whither at thy will,
curst greed of gold, may mortal hearts be driven?"

Posteriores ita generalia quaedam ad mores pertinentia exhibent, ut simul ostendant, quid in iisdem verum et laudabile ponat affirmans:

The latter so exhibit certain general things pertaining to morals that at the same time they show what the one affirming posits in them as true and praiseworthy:

Sourced quotation · Virgil [576]

Discite iustitiam moniti, et non temnere Divos.

"O, ere too late, learn justice and fear God!"

Hic adhibebitur bene cautio, de qua § 547, quo crebrius ea confundi, quae fiunt, quaeque debent fieri, quotidiana docet experientia.

Here the caution about which § 547 speaks will be well applied, since daily experience teaches how often those things that happen and those things that ought to happen are confused.

Sourced quotation · Pliny the Younger [577]

Quoto cuique eadem honestatis cura secreto, quae palam? Multi famam, conscientiam pauci verentur,

"How few there are who are as careful of acting honourably in secret as in public! While many people are afraid of what others will say, few are afraid of their own conscience."

Plin. III, ep. 20. Tandem meminerimus in sententiis § 174, nec eas temere cumulemus, ubicunque vivendi praeceptores videri nolumus, ne quando nobis forte videmur gravissimi, tenues gnomotypikon venas imitari videamur, de quibus, § 370.

Pliny, III, letter 20. Finally let us remember, concerning maxims, § 174, and not pile them up rashly wherever we do not wish to seem teachers of living, lest, when perhaps we seem to ourselves most weighty, we seem to imitate the thin veins of the gnomotypikon, about which, § 370.

§ 550

Philosophi post geometras accurati noverint, quantum ad eruendam veritatem valeat vera definitio, praesertim genetica.

Accurate philosophers, after geometers, have known how much a true definition, especially a genetic one, avails for digging out truth.

Haec de multis pulcre cogitandis in logico etiam rigore concepta si cognita fuerit eleganter meditaturo, etiamsi non ipsa totidem syllabis et notis exprimatur, quot eam intellectus distincte cognovit, sed vel omittatur omnino, vel pluribus interstincta notis et characteribus in pleniorem analogoque rationis rotundiorem diluatur descriptionem, vel nominalem, vel realem, tamen notionis directricis instar, uti plures ad elegantias viam sternet, ita foedam impossibilitatem internam figmenti utopici cavebit, praebebit internam, nonnunquam etiam externam, possibilitatem descripti, primam eius unitatem, nexum cum caussis et prima consectaria, facili negotio ex regulis artis aesthetices exornanda in veritatem aestheticam, S. XXVII. Hinc definitionem nunc non possum non legere in argumentis probantibus, vel omissam, seu non explicite cogitatam, vel transformatam in satis bellam descriptionem, § 539.

If this, conceived even in logical rigor concerning many things to be thought beautifully, shall be known to one who is about to meditate elegantly, even if it is not itself expressed in the same number of syllables and marks by which the intellect distinctly knew it, but either be omitted altogether, or, interspersed with several marks and characters, be diluted into a fuller description, more rounded by the analogue of reason, either nominal or real, nevertheless, in the manner of a directing notion, as it will pave the way to many elegances, so it will guard against the ugly internal impossibility of a utopian fiction, it will furnish the internal, sometimes also the external, possibility of the thing described, its first unity, its connection with causes and first consequences, to be adorned with easy business from the rules of the art of aesthetics into aesthetic truth, Section XXVII. Hence I now cannot fail to read definition among proving arguments, either omitted, or not explicitly thought, or transformed into a sufficiently beautiful description, § 539.

Sources and textual notes

[557] Juvenal, Satires 1.145. Rev. Lewis Evans, The Satires of Juvenal, Persius, Sulpicia, and Lucilius (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1881), Project Gutenberg text. Source 1

Baumgarten prints the older spelling coenas for cenas, adds commas, capitalizes the line, and substitutes a comma for Juvenal's colon. Evans expands nec tristis: the scandalous news is “not mournful” to the dead man's dinner-table acquaintances and therefore calls forth no grief.

Reuse information

Evans died in 1869 and the cited edition was published in 1881; the translation is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg supplies the digital text.

[558] Cicero, De inventione 1.27 (traditional subdivision 1.19), quoting a tragic fragment of Pacuvius, usually assigned to Medus. Charles Duke Yonge, De Inventione (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853), Wikisource transcription. Source 1

Cicero transmits this Pacuvian tragic fragment as his example of a fabula, a narrative containing events that are neither true nor probable. Baumgarten attributes the immediate citation to Cicero and replaces the source ellipsis with a period; the quoted wording otherwise agrees.

Reuse information

Yonge died in 1891 and the cited translation was published in 1853; it is in the public domain. Wikisource supplies the digital transcription.

[559] Terence, Andria, prologue 1-3. Henry Thomas Riley and George Colman, The Comedies of Terence (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1874), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten prints the genitive negotii where the comparison text has contracted negoti and adds a comma after placerent, besides altering punctuation and capitalization. Riley and Colman turn Terence's three verse lines into one prose sentence.

Reuse information

The cited edition was published in 1874 and is in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[560] Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.658-660. Brookes More, The Metamorphoses of Ovid (Boston: Cornhill Publishing Co., 1922), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten inserts (Pentheu) to identify the addressee and (Bacchum) to supply the referent of ipsum, then rearranges the source parenthesis and changes punctuation and capitalization. He stops before Ovid's next example, stetit aequore puppis.

Reuse information

More's translation was published in 1922 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[561] Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.699-700. Brookes More, The Metamorphoses of Ovid (Boston: Cornhill Publishing Co., 1922), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten parenthesizes fama est, adds several commas, and changes capitalization; the words otherwise agree with Ovid's text. More reorders the two coordinated wonders, translating the falling chains before the self-opening doors.

Reuse information

More's translation was published in 1922 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[562] Phaedrus, Fabulae Aesopiae 3.10.5-6. Henry Thomas Riley, The Comedies of Terence and the Fables of Phaedrus (London: George Bell and Sons, 1887), Project Gutenberg text. Source 1

Baumgarten omits Phaedrus's initial Ergo and prints Quem where the source has conjunction quam (“rather than” or “before”), besides changing punctuation and capitalization. Riley's “erroneous impression” renders stulta ... sententia and makes the comparison idiomatic.

Reuse information

Riley died in 1878 and the cited edition was published in 1887; the translation is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg supplies the digital text.

[563] Petronius, Satyrica 118.6. W. C. Firebaugh, The Satyricon of Petronius Arbiter (New York: Horace Liveright, 1922), Project Gutenberg text. Source 1

Petronius says that the free spirit “should be hurled headlong” (praecipitandus est liber spiritus). Baumgarten makes the larger epic fable the subject and rewrites this as active praecipitat liberum spiritum. He also inserts de castis heroum amoribus, which has no counterpart in Petronius, and omits the opening contrast with historical narration. Firebaugh's “mythological illusion” appears to be his rendering of fabulosum; the printed wording has been retained.

Reuse information

Firebaugh's translation was published in 1922 and is in the United States public domain. Project Gutenberg supplies the digital text.

[564] Lucretius, De rerum natura 2.1023 and 2.1040-1044, with the final sentence continuing through 2.1047. William Ellery Leonard, De Rerum Natura (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1916), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten joins 2.1023 directly to 2.1040, omitting sixteen lines on novelty and the waning of wonder. He changes plural videntur and neuter falsum to singular videtur and feminine falsa, apparently making both agree with ratio. He then ends after the subject animus, although Lucretius's sentence continues for three more lines to ask what lies beyond the world's walls. The editorial ellipses in Leonard's translation mark both omissions.

Reuse information

Leonard's translation was published in 1916 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[565] Quintilian, Institutio oratoria 5.10.11. H. E. Butler, The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, vol. 2 (London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1920), LacusCurtius transcription. Source 1

Baumgarten's ellipsis reflects his parenthetical insertion (probans) after argumentum in the surrounding prose, not omitted words in Quintilian's definition. He stops before Quintilian's consequence that every case must contain something needing no proof. Butler renders ratio as “process of reasoning” and turns the two relative clauses into coordinated English predicates.

Reuse information

Butler's translation was published in 1920 and is in the United States public domain. LacusCurtius identifies and reproduces the public-domain Loeb text.

[566] Quintilian, Institutio oratoria 5.10.15. H. E. Butler, The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, vol. 2 (London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1920), LacusCurtius transcription. Source 1

Baumgarten omits etiam, changes the semicolon to a period, and prints exorta where Quintilian's text has Greek εἰκότα, “probabilities” or “probable arguments.” The latter is likely a typographical or transcriptional corruption and materially changes the claim. Butler's “meaning” for vis and “usual effects” for quid ... plerumque efficiat capture the practical knowledge Quintilian requires.

Reuse information

Butler's translation was published in 1920 and is in the United States public domain. LacusCurtius identifies and reproduces the public-domain Loeb text.

[567] Ovid, Epistulae ex Ponto 2.5.63-64. Arthur Leslie Wheeler, Ovid: Tristia; Ex Ponto (London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1924), Internet Archive scan. Source 1

The wording agrees exactly; Baumgarten changes only initial capitalization and terminal punctuation. Ovid's paregmenon repeats the roots of studium/studiose and ingenium/ingeniose. Wheeler retains both figures with “devotion ... studious” and “talented ... talent,” although “Pierians” requires the reader to supply “Muses.”

Reuse information

Wheeler's translation was published in 1924 and is in the United States public domain. The Internet Archive supplies the consulted scan.

[568] Cicero, Pro Plancio 24. C. D. Yonge, The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, vol. 3 (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1856), ToposText transcription. Source 1

The antecedent of ordinis eius is the preceding body of publicani; Baumgarten supplies this in parentheses. He omits igitur and ipsius, prints Plancii for Planci, and has a second quia where the comparison text has quod, besides changing punctuation. Yonge's “company of farmers” means the publicani, the companies that contracted to collect public revenues.

Reuse information

Yonge died in 1891 and the cited translation was published in 1856; it is in the public domain. ToposText identifies its transcription as a public-domain Perseus text.

[569] Juvenal, Satires 6.279-285. Rev. Lewis Evans, The Satires of Juvenal, Persius, Sulpicia, and Lucilius (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1881), Project Gutenberg text. Source 1

Baumgarten inserts (uxor) to identify the woman, prints heic for hic, changes punctuation and capitalization, and turns Juvenal's verse into a prose-like paragraph. In rhetorical usage color is a plausible presentation or excuse; Evans makes this explicit with “colorable excuse.” His “I am mortal” follows homo sum literally in gender-neutral Latin, while the speaker is the adulterous wife.

Reuse information

Evans died in 1869 and the cited edition was published in 1881; the translation is in the public domain. Project Gutenberg supplies the digital text.

[570] Virgil, Aeneid 11.336-337 and 11.340, incorporated into Baumgarten's phrase animum tegit. Theodore C. Williams, The Aeneid of Virgil (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1910), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

The concordance item is not a continuous Virgilian sentence. Baumgarten selects infensus ... amaris and seditione potentem from Virgil's description, changes nominative potens to accusative potentem so that it modifies his own animum, and supplies tegit (“conceals”). The ellipsis in Williams's translation marks Virgil's omitted description of Drances's wealth, speech, hand in battle, and standing in counsel. Williams's “in quarrels stronger still” is his rendering of seditione potens.

Reuse information

Williams's translation was published in 1910 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[571] Virgil, Aeneid 11.399-400. Theodore C. Williams, The Aeneid of Virgil (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1910), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Turnus throws Drances's preceding claim, nulla salus bello, back at him. Baumgarten removes the quotation marks around that echoed phrase, moves commas, capitalizes Capiti, and adds a comma after Dardanio; the words otherwise agree. Williams's “doomed” interprets the hostile force of directing the prophecy at the Dardanian head.

Reuse information

Williams's translation was published in 1910 and is in the United States public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[572] Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 1.1. John Selby Watson, Sallust, Florus, and Velleius Paterculus (London: George Bell and Sons, 1899), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten regularizes Sallust's archaic accusative plural Omnis to Omnes, prints caeteris for ceteris and obedientia for oboedientia, and changes punctuation. Watson's “beasts of the field” expands pecora, while “groveling” represents their naturally downward posture.

Reuse information

Watson died in 1884 and the cited edition was published in 1899; the translation is in the public domain. Perseus supplies the digital text.

[573] Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 1.3. John Selby Watson, Sallust, Florus, and Velleius Paterculus (London: George Bell and Sons, 1899), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten omits Sallust's connective quo, which Watson renders “therefore,” and regularizes ingeni and maxume to ingenii and maxime. His commas also isolate phrases that run continuously in the comparison text. Watson renders virium opibus as bodily rather than generic strength because Sallust is contrasting mind and body.

Reuse information

Watson died in 1884 and the cited edition was published in 1899; the translation is in the public domain. Perseus supplies the digital text.

[574] Euripides, Phoenissae 524-525, translated into Latin by Cicero at De officiis 3.82; compare Suetonius, Divus Iulius 30.5. Arthur S. Way, translation of Euripides's Phoenician Maidens, quoted in Walter Miller, trans., Cicero, De Officiis (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann; New York: Macmillan, 1913), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten omits Cicero's initial Nam but otherwise follows his Latin version. Way translates the underlying Greek rather than translating Cicero word for word: “most right” reflects Greek κάλλιστον ἀδικεῖν, whereas Cicero's repeated violandum est is less explicit. Cicero's regnandi also softens Greek τυραννίδος (“tyranny”) into ruling or kingship.

Reuse information

Way's translation and Miller's edition were published before 1929 and are in the United States public domain. Perseus reproduces the translation and explicitly credits Way.

[575] Virgil, Aeneid 3.56-57. Theodore C. Williams, The Aeneid of Virgil (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1910), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Virgil places the apostrophe auri sacra fames after the question; Baumgarten brings it forward. More materially, Baumgarten prints quo (“whither”) for Virgil's quid (“to what [deed]”), a reading closely matched by Williams's “whither ... may ... be driven.” Williams translates the contextually pejorative sacra as “curst.”

Reuse information

Williams died in 1925 and the translation was published in 1910; it is in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[576] Virgil, Aeneid 6.620. Theodore C. Williams, The Aeneid of Virgil (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1910), Perseus Digital Library text. Source 1

Baumgarten preserves Virgil's complete line. Williams paraphrases moniti as “ere too late,” and renders the plural divos with singular “God”; his “fear” gives the positive contrary of non temnere (“do not despise”).

Reuse information

Williams died in 1925 and the translation was published in 1910; it is in the public domain. The Perseus canonical repository supplies the digital source file.

[577] Pliny the Younger, Epistulae 3.20.8. John B. Firth, The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series, vol. 1 (London: Walter Scott Publishing Co., ca. 1900), following Heinrich Keil's Teubner text; Project Gutenberg eBook 3234. Source 1

Baumgarten omits Pliny's initial Nam and changes punctuation but preserves the antithesis. Firth expands compact famam into “what others will say,” as against the inward judgment of conscience.

Reuse information

Firth's translation was published around 1900 and is in the United States public domain. Project Gutenberg supplies the digital text.